FDA · Life Science & Pharma: GxP - CSV & Data Integrity
Data Integrity and Compliance With Drug CGMP: Questions and Answers (FDA guidance)
Final Data Integrity · Questions and answers Last verified: not yet · Source last checked 3 Nov 2026
- Issued by
- FDA
- Category
- Data Integrity
- Sub Category
- Questions and answers
- Legal weight
- Guidance & Q&A
- Reuse
- Public domain
FDA's questions and answers on keeping drug manufacturing data reliable, covering topics like audit trails and shared logins.
How to read this page
- The line under the title explains in plain words what this item is for. The coloured label beside its status gives its Category, its main subject, and Sub Category, the type of document, in the same colours as the maps.
- Status comes from the latest dated event below, and each event links to its source.
- Lifecycle shows the steps so far, then any expected target. Targets are not facts.
- In plain English is our own summary, not the official text. Where we have read the document in detail, a fuller profile follows, with its context, scope, contents and key points.
- Related shows links to other documents. Select Compare to see two side by side.
Lifecycle
Solid steps have happened. A dashed step is expected, and it is not a fact. Only dated steps in our record appear here.
- Final guidance published (Dec 2018)
In plain English
FDA's question-and-answer guidance on data integrity in drug manufacturing: ALCOA, audit trail review, access controls, shared logins and when electronic data are CGMP records.
Summary drafted with AI assistance. Not yet reviewed by the SME Reviewer. Read the official text before acting.
Context and history
FDA published this guidance in December 2018 as questions and answers on data integrity for drug manufacturing. It came after years of warning letters citing data integrity problems, and it explains how FDA reads existing CGMP rules. It adds no new requirements of its own: it points to parts 210, 211 and 212, and asks firms to apply risk-based thinking.
It has become a reference point for inspections worldwide, together with the MHRA, PIC/S and EMA documents on the same subject.
Who and what it applies to
Manufacturers subject to drug CGMP regulations, including drugs, biologics and veterinary products, and PET drugs under part 212.
What it contains
- Introduction and background
- Explains why data integrity matters, and that the guidance gives FDA's current thinking.
- Q1 Terms
- Clarifies data integrity, metadata, audit trail, static and dynamic records, backup, and systems in the CGMP context.
- Q2 Invalidating results
- When a CGMP result may be invalidated, which needs a valid documented scientific reason.
- Q3 Workflow validation
- Each CGMP workflow on a computer system is an intended use to validate, with the extent based on risk.
- Q4 and Q5 Access
- Restricting access to authorised personnel, and why shared login accounts cannot meet CGMP: a unique person cannot be identified.
- Q6 Blank forms
- Controlling blank forms.
- Q7 and Q8 Audit trails
- Those responsible for record review should review audit trails, as they would cross-outs on paper. Follow the review frequency in CGMP rules where one is set, and otherwise base it on risk.
- Q9 and Q10 Copies and originals
- When electronic copies are acceptable, and when printouts or static records are not enough for dynamic data.
- Q11 Electronic signatures
- Using electronic signatures for master records.
- Q12 CGMP records
- When generated to satisfy a CGMP requirement, all data becomes a CGMP record.
- Q13 and Q14 Laboratory data
- Using actual samples in system suitability tests, and saving only final reprocessed results.
- Q15 to Q18 People and remediation
- Anonymous tips, training on detecting problems, FDA's access to electronic records, and how to address problems: investigate scope and root cause, assess risk, and set a management strategy.
Key points
- CGMP data is any data generated to satisfy a CGMP requirement.
- Every CGMP workflow on a system is an intended use to validate.
- Shared logins fail CGMP, because a unique person cannot be identified.
- Record reviewers should review audit trails too.
- A printout is enough only if it is the original or a true copy, which it generally cannot be for dynamic data.
- Testing into compliance with trial injections is a concern, so keep all data.
- FDA may review electronic records during inspection.
- Remediation means scope, root cause, risk assessment and a management strategy.
In practice
General reading, not advice. This is drafted with AI and may not fit your situation. It does not replace the official text, your own quality system or qualified advice, and an inspector may take a different view.
- Remove shared accounts from laboratory instruments first, a frequent inspection finding.
- Build audit trail review into batch and data review, not as a separate exercise.
- Keep original electronic data from stand-alone instruments, not only printouts.
- Train staff on what a data integrity problem looks like, and how to raise one.
Read from the source document on 1 Nov 2026. This is our own description, not the official text. Check the full dated history in the change log below.
Change log
Key dated events only, not a complete history. Status after is the status once that event happened. Event kinds explained
| Date | Event | Status after | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ~1 Dec 2018 | Final guidance published (Dec 2018) | Final | Source for Final guidance published (Dec 2018) |
Related
How other documents connect to this one. Links explained
- Related to 21 CFR Part 11· Compare with 21 CFR Part 11 Unverified link
- Interprets 21 CFR Part 211· Compare with 21 CFR Part 211 Unverified link
- Risk basis from ICH Q9(R1)· Compare with ICH Q9(R1) Unverified link
- Related to Part 11 scope guidance· Compare with Part 11 scope guidance Unverified link
Official source
The official text always prevails over anything on this site.
Source: FDA. Public domain.
Stay updated
Newsletter signup opens at launch.