Tool: Timeline Maps
Every dated event, from the earliest to the latest expected, with one row per item so you can follow each document from start to finish.
How to read this page
- Each row is one item, A to Z, grouped by authority. An older version and its replacement share a row.
- Time runs left to right, on a real scale, and each year from 2020 is drawn wider. Each marker is one event, coloured by the status after it.
- Solid lines join the steps of one version. Dashed lines lead from an older version to its replacement.
- Dashed diamonds are targets: expected dates, not facts. The red line is today.
- Warning letters have their own group under FDA, closed until you open it. Letters are selected, from a 10-year window. Current FDA data available via the automated system is limited to 2021 onwards. Note that this is dependent upon the FDA and thus may be impacted intermittently and historically regarding the list of related warning/close-out letters.
- Select a row or marker to focus on it and list its steps. Double-click to open the item, or right-click for options. Click empty space or press Esc to clear.
- Filter with the keys: open Status / Category Filters & Settings above the map, then select one or more colours to highlight them and filter the events below. Zoom and the keys are there too. Choices in a group widen the results, and Status and Category narrow each other. Select again to clear.
- Jump around: the bar above the map takes you to the chronological map or the events.
- Prefer text? The list has the same events, with links, and also shows routine checks.
Chronological map
Status / Category Filters & Settings
Markers and lines
- Solid marker: a dated event
- Dashed diamond: a target, expected and not a fact
- Solid line: the steps of one version
- Dashed line: an older version leading to its replacement
Select one or more colours to highlight them and filter the events below. Status applies to each event. Select again to clear.
Status
Category and Sub Category
Medical Device Items
TitleCategorySub CategoryPurpose
EU · EC / EMA (11)
EC Annex 11CSV & Data IntegrityAnnexThe EU's main GMP rulebook for computerised systems. It sets out how systems used in making medicines must be validated, secured and controlled.
EC Annex 15Quality foundationsAnnexThe EU's GMP rules on qualifying equipment and validating manufacturing processes.
EC Annex 22 · AIAIAnnexA proposed new EU GMP annex on using AI models in medicine manufacturing. It would be the first EU GMP text written for AI, and is still a draft.
EC Chapter 1Quality foundationsChapterThe EU's GMP rules on the pharmaceutical quality system, which is the framework a manufacturer uses to manage quality.
EC Chapter 4Data IntegrityChapterThe EU's GMP rules on documentation. It explains which records a manufacturer must keep and how to keep them reliable.
EMA AI reflection paperAIGuidelineEMA's thinking on using AI across a medicine's life, from discovery to after approval. It is a reflection paper, so it is not a binding rule.
EMA CS clinical trialsCSV & Data IntegrityGuidelineEMA's guideline on computerised systems and electronic data in clinical trials, such as audit trails, cloud services and vendor agreements.
EMA GMP Q&A: IT and DICSV & Data IntegrityQuestions and answersQuestions and answers from EU inspectors explaining how they read Annex 11 and data integrity in practice.
EMA notice: CS in trialsCSVGuidanceA reminder from EMA that clinical trial sponsors must be able to show their computerised systems are validated, even when vendors supply them.
EU AI ActAIRegulationThe EU's general law on artificial intelligence, covering all sectors. What it requires depends on the risk of the AI system and the role of the company.
HMA-EMA AI workplanAIGuidanceThe plan for how EU medicines regulators will use and oversee AI up to 2028. It shows direction and creates no duties for companies.
PIC/S · ICH · ISPE (9)
ICH E6(R3) GCPQuality foundationsGuidelineThe international guideline on good clinical practice, the standard for running clinical trials. This version adds a section on data governance.
ICH Q10Quality foundationsGuidelineThe international model for a pharmaceutical quality system across a product's life. It builds on GMP.
ICH Q9(R1)Quality foundationsGuidelineThe international guideline on quality risk management. It explains how to find, assess and control risks to medicine quality.
ISPE GAMP 5, 2nd ed.CSVIndustry guideThe industry's best-known guide to a risk-based way of validating GxP computerised systems. It is good practice, not law.
ISPE GAMP Records & DI guideData IntegrityIndustry guideThe industry's guide to records and data integrity. It is good practice, not law.
PIC/S GMP Guide PE 009Quality foundationsGuidelineThe GMP guide used by inspectors in many countries. It closely follows the EU GMP Guide, so it sets a shared baseline for manufacturers.
PIC/S PI 006-4Quality foundationsGuidelinePIC/S recommendations for inspectors on qualification and validation, supporting Annex 15 of the PIC/S Guide.
PIC/S PI 011-3CSVGuidelineGuidance written for inspectors on computerised systems. Companies read it to see what inspectors are trained to look for.
PIC/S PI 041-1Data IntegrityGuidanceGuidance written for inspectors on keeping data reliable in GMP and GDP work. Companies read it to see what inspectors look for.
US · FDA (13)
FDA 21 CFR Part 11CSV & Data IntegrityRegulationThe US rule that says when FDA accepts electronic records and signatures in place of paper and handwritten ones.
FDA 21 CFR Part 211Quality foundationsRegulationThe US rules for making finished medicines, known as drug CGMP. Section 211.68 is the part that covers computers and automated equipment.
FDA AI guidance (drugs)AIGuidanceFDA's draft guidance on showing an AI model can be trusted when it supports decisions about a drug's safety, effectiveness or quality.
FDA BA/BE data integrityData IntegrityGuidanceFDA's draft guidance on keeping data reliable in bioavailability and bioequivalence studies, which compare how the body takes up a drug.
FDA blood system validationCSVGuidanceFDA's guidance on validating the computer systems that blood establishments use. It is also a compact example of a validation plan.
FDA CPG 425 seriesCSVGuidanceEarly FDA policy guides on computers in drug manufacturing. They explain how the drug GMP rules apply to hardware and software.
FDA CSA guidanceMedical Device Item Related to CSVCSVGuidanceFDA's guidance on checking software used in device production and quality systems. It asks for effort that matches the risk, not paperwork for its own sake.
FDA data integrity Q&AData IntegrityQuestions and answersFDA's questions and answers on keeping drug manufacturing data reliable, covering topics like audit trails and shared logins.
FDA electronic systems Q&ACSV & Data IntegrityQuestions and answersFDA's questions and answers on electronic systems, records and signatures used in clinical trials.
FDA Part 11 scope guidanceCSV & Data IntegrityGuidanceFDA's explanation of how it reads Part 11 in practice, including where it uses discretion and which records are covered.
FDA quality systems guideQuality foundationsGuidanceFDA's guidance showing how a modern quality system fits with the US drug GMP rules.
FDA software validationMedical Device Item Related to CSVCSVGuidanceFDA's long-standing guidance on the general principles of validating software, mainly for medical devices.
FDA–EMA AI principlesAIPrinciplesTen high-level principles agreed by FDA and EMA for using AI well across a medicine's life. They are not binding.
Warning letters and close-outs (18)
FDA AI warning letterAIEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm that used AI to write GMP documents without proper review. It shows how FDA applies existing rules to AI.
FDA Allay WL 2021CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, which did not assess the risk of having no audit trail controls and unique user passwords.
FDA Aspen WL 2025CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, which did not review electronic raw data and audit trails before releasing batches.
FDA BBC Group WL 2021CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, whose laboratory system lacked restricted access and had audit trails switched off.
FDA Chromatography Inst. WL 2025CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to a testing laboratory, for weak laboratory controls and computer system vulnerabilities it had not assessed.
FDA Curia WL 2026CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, where staff shared usernames and passwords for a system used for GMP analysis.
FDA Intas WL 2023CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, where original records were destroyed and electronic batch records could be changed.
FDA Jaloma WL 2026CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, for incomplete laboratory records and weak controls over changes to computer data.
FDA Jost Chemical WL 2022CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, which had no procedures for its quality unit to review audit trails.
FDA Landy WL 2024CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, where staff shared a password kept in a drawer, on a system with no audit trail.
FDA Lex WL 2023CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, where laboratory staff held administrator rights and data changes could not be traced.
FDA Medgel WL 2023Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, whose raw humidity data was not backed up and was deleted every month.
FDA Missouri Analytical WL 2021CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to a testing laboratory, where deleted data files and falsified records were found.
FDA MMC Healthcare WL 2024CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, with backdated validation reports and a laboratory system with no audit trail.
FDA Nortec WL 2022CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, where over 100 deleted files were found on instrument computers.
FDA Sanitor WL 2021CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, whose laboratory system could not prevent deletion of raw data.
FDA Ultra Seal WL 2022CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, whose laboratory audit trails showed deleted and aborted work with no recorded reason.
FDA Vi-Jon WL 2022CSV & Data IntegrityEnforcementAn FDA warning letter to one firm, where deleted files were found on a computer and audit trails were not reviewed before batch release.
UK · MHRA (2)
MHRA AI regulation paperAIGuidanceThe UK regulator's paper on how it applies the government's AI principles to medicines and medical devices. It is policy, not a rule.
MHRA GxP data integrityData IntegrityGuidanceThe UK regulator's guidance on data integrity across GxP work. Its clear definitions make it a popular starting point for learning the subject.
Other national (4)
Health Canada GUI-0050CSV & Data IntegrityAnnexCanada's guidance on computerised systems, adopted directly from Annex 11 of the PIC/S GMP Guide, with Canadian terms.
NMPA AI opinionsAIGuidanceChina's plan for how regulators will use AI in their own work on medicines, such as review and inspection. It is aimed at regulators, not companies.
PMDA Japan CS guidelineCSVGuidelineJapan's guideline on computerised systems for drug manufacturers, covering a system's life from development to retirement.
PMDA Japan PIC/S GMP noticeQuality foundationsGuidanceA Japanese notice introducing the PIC/S GMP Guide as guidance for GMP at manufacturing sites.
Time runs left to right. Each year from 2020 is drawn wider, because that is where most events fall. How to read the timeline · What each Category means
All 107 events
2028
- Target 2 Aug 2028EU AI Act: Annex I (product-embedded, e.g. devices) high-risk obligations applyExpected: Effective · phased
2027
- Target 2 Dec 2027EU AI Act: Annex III high-risk obligations applyExpected: Effective · phased
2026
- Target 31 Dec 2026Annex 11 revision: Target: final text to European Commission (Q4 2026, slipped from Q1 2026)Expected: Final text to EC
- Target 31 Dec 2026Annex 22 · AI: Target: final text to European Commission (Q4 2026)Expected: Final text to EC
- Target 31 Dec 2026Chapter 4 revision: Target: final text to European Commission (Q4 2026)Expected: Final text to EC
- 1 Nov 2026EMA GMP Q&A: IT and DI: Data integrity section (23 questions) listed; no date shownFinal
- 30 Oct 2026FDA AI guidance (drugs): Checked: still draft; no final guidance foundDraft
- 30 Oct 2026PIC/S GMP Guide PE 009: Checked: PE 009-18 listed as current on PIC/S publications pageIn force
- 29 Oct 2026EMA notice: CS in trials: Revision 1: administrative update of referencesFinal
- 1 Oct 2026PIC/S PI 006-4: Version PI 006-4 dated 1 Oct 2026Final
- 29 Sep 2026Annex 11 (2011): Checked: still the version in EudraLex Vol 4In force
- 29 Sep 2026Annex 22 · AI: Checked: not yet in EudraLex Vol 4Draft
- 23 Sep 2026PIC/S GMP Guide PE 009: PE 009-18 published (revised Annex 19, reference and retention samples); supersedes PE 009-17In force
- 18 Sep 2026Curia WL 2026: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 2 Aug 2026EU AI Act: Article 50 transparency duties apply (Art. 50(2) marking for systems already on the market: 2 Dec 2026, per the Omnibus)Effective · phased
- 27 Jul 2026EU AI Act: Digital Omnibus on AI, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, in force (published in the Official Journal 24 Jul 2026); defers high-risk obligationsEffective · phased
- 30 Jun 2026Annex 22 · AI: EMA multistakeholder workshop on comments and generative AI (30 Jun–1 Jul)Draft
- 22 May 2026Jaloma WL 2026: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 2 Apr 2026FDA AI warning letter: Warning letter 320-26-58 issued (2 Apr 2026)Warning letter
- 2 Apr 2026NMPA AI opinions: Issued by NMPAFinal
- 3 Feb 2026FDA CSA guidance: Updated and retitled for QMS softwareFinal
- 14 Jan 2026FDA–EMA AI principles: Published jointly by FDA and EMA (non-binding principles)Final
2025
- 7 Oct 2025Annex 11 revision: Public consultation closedDraft
- 7 Oct 2025Annex 22 · AI: Public consultation closedDraft
- 7 Oct 2025Chapter 4 revision: Public consultation closedDraft
- 24 Sep 2025FDA CSA guidance: Final guidance publishedFinal
- 8 Sep 2025ICH E6(R3) GCP: Published by FDA as final guidanceFinal
- 3 Sep 2025Chapter 1 revision: Consultation document publishedDraft
- 20 Aug 2025Chromatography Inst. WL 2025: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 7 Jul 2025Annex 11 revision: Draft published for public consultationDraft
- 7 Jul 2025Annex 22 · AI: Draft published for public consultationDraft
- 7 Jul 2025Chapter 4 revision: Draft published for public consultationDraft
- 22 May 2025Medgel WL 2023: Close-out letter issuedWarning letter (closed)
- 24 Feb 2025Aspen WL 2025: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 7 Jan 2025FDA AI guidance (drugs): Draft guidance published (comments closed 7 Apr 2025)Draft
2024
- 9 Oct 2024Missouri Analytical WL 2021: Close-out letter issuedWarning letter (closed)
- 1 Oct 2024FDA electronic systems Q&A: Final guidance issued (October 2024)Final
- 30 Sep 2024EMA AI reflection paper: Final version publishedFinal
- 25 Sep 2024Ultra Seal WL 2022: Close-out letter issued, for Ultra Seal Corporation FEI 1317759Warning letter (closed)
- 24 Sep 2024MMC Healthcare WL 2024: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 9 Sep 2024EMA AI reflection paper: Final version adopted by CHMPFinal
- 1 Aug 2024EU AI Act: Entered into force (obligations phased)Effective · phased
- 12 Jun 2024Landy WL 2024: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 30 Apr 2024MHRA AI regulation paper: PublishedFinal
- 3 Apr 2024FDA BA/BE data integrity: Draft guidance issuedDraft
- 8 Mar 2024Vi-Jon WL 2022: Close-out letter issuedWarning letter (closed)
2023
- 31 Dec 2023EMA AI reflection paper: Public consultation closedDraft
- 18 Dec 2023HMA-EMA AI workplan: PublishedFinal
- 23 Oct 2023Nortec WL 2022: Close-out letter issuedWarning letter (closed)
- 17 Aug 2023Lex WL 2023: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 28 Jul 2023Intas WL 2023: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 20 Jul 2023Medgel WL 2023: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 19 Jul 2023EMA AI reflection paper: Draft released for public consultationDraft
- 10 Mar 2023EMA CS clinical trials: Final version publishedFinal
- 10 Mar 2023EMA eSource paper (2010): Replaced by the 2023 guidelineSuperseded
- 7 Mar 2023EMA CS clinical trials: Final version adopted by the GCP Inspectors Working GroupFinal
- 18 Jan 2023ICH Q9(R1): Reached Step 4 (final)Final
2022
- 8 Dec 2022Nortec WL 2022: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 16 Nov 2022Annex 11 revision: Concept paper on revising Annex 11 (EMA/INS/GMP/778340/2022)Concept
- 13 Sep 2022FDA CSA guidance: Draft guidance publishedDraft
- 29 Jul 2022ISPE GAMP 5, 2nd ed.: Second edition published (29 Jul 2022)Industry guide
- 18 Jul 2022Allay WL 2021: Close-out letter issuedWarning letter (closed)
- 18 Jul 2022Jost Chemical WL 2022: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 31 Mar 2022Vi-Jon WL 2022: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 14 Mar 2022Ultra Seal WL 2022: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
2021
- 17 Dec 2021EMA CS clinical trials: Public consultation closedDraft
- 29 Nov 2021Sanitor WL 2021: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 18 Nov 2021ICH Q9(R1): Q9(R1) released for public consultation at Step 2Draft
- 30 Sep 2021Missouri Analytical WL 2021: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 27 Sep 2021MHRA GxP data integrity: MHRA Inspectorate blog: for GLP facilities the OECD advisory document on data integrity takes precedence; MHRA guidance still supplements it (guidance text itself not revised)Final
- 10 Aug 2021Health Canada GUI-0050: PublishedFinal
- 4 Aug 2021BBC Group WL 2021: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
- 1 Jul 2021PIC/S PI 041-1: Final version publishedFinal
- 18 Jun 2021EMA CS clinical trials: Public consultation startedDraft
- 27 Jan 2021Allay WL 2021: Warning letter issuedWarning letter
2020
- 7 Apr 2020EMA notice: CS in trials: First publishedFinal
2018
- ~1 Dec 2018FDA data integrity Q&A: Final guidance published (Dec 2018)Final
- 4 Apr 2018MHRA GxP data integrity: Earlier GMP guidance withdrawn, replaced by this GxP guidanceFinal
- 9 Mar 2018MHRA GxP data integrity: PublishedFinal
2017
- ~1 Mar 2017GAMP Records & DI guide: Published (March 2017)Industry guide
2015
- 1 Oct 2015Annex 15: Came into operationIn force
- 13 Mar 2015MHRA GxP data integrity: Earlier GMP guidance updated with clarificationsFinal
- 23 Jan 2015MHRA GxP data integrity: Earlier GMP data integrity definitions and guidance first publishedFinal
2013
- ~1 Apr 2013FDA blood system validation: Final guidance issued (April 2013)Final
- 31 Jan 2013Chapter 1 (2013): Came into operationIn force
2012
- 1 Feb 2012Japan PIC/S GMP notice: Administrative notice issuedFinal
2011
- 30 Jun 2011Annex 11 (2011): Came into operationIn force
- 30 Jun 2011Chapter 4 (2011): Came into operationIn force
- ~1 Feb 2011EMA GMP Q&A: IT and DI: Annex 11 questions dated February 2011Final
- ~1 Jan 2011Annex 11 (2011): Revision 1 published in EudraLex Volume 4 (January 2011)Final
- ~1 Jan 2011Chapter 4 (2011): Revision 1 published in EudraLex Volume 4 (January 2011)Final
2010
- 21 Oct 2010Japan CS guideline: Notification No. 1021-11 issuedFinal
- 1 Aug 2010EMA eSource paper (2010): Came into effectFinal
- 9 Jun 2010EMA eSource paper (2010): Adopted by the GCP Inspectors Working GroupFinal
2009
- 8 Apr 2009ICH Q10: Published by FDA as guidanceFinal
2007
- 25 Sep 2007PIC/S PI 011-3: Version PI 011-3 dated 25 Sep 2007Final
2006
- 2 Oct 2006FDA quality systems guide: Final guidance issuedFinal
2005
- 9 Nov 2005ICH Q9(R1): Original Q9 reached Step 4Final
2003
- 5 Sep 2003Part 11 scope guidance: Final guidance issuedFinal
- 1 Sep 2003PIC/S PI 011-3: Entered into forceFinal
2002
- 11 Jan 2002FDA software validation: Version 2.0 issued, superseding the 1997 draftFinal
1997
- 20 Aug 199721 CFR Part 11: EffectiveIn force
- 9 Jun 1997FDA software validation: Draft version 1.1 dated 9 Jun 1997Draft
- ~1 Mar 199721 CFR Part 11: Final rule issued (March 1997)Final
1987
- 4 Sep 1987FDA CPG 425 series: Sec. 425.100 revisedFinal
1984
- 19 Oct 1984FDA CPG 425 series: Sec. 425.100 originally issuedFinal
1978
- 29 Sep 197821 CFR Part 211: Published at 43 FR 45077In force