Compare EMA CS clinical trials and EMA eSource paper (2010)
How to read this page
- How they are linked says why these two documents are connected. Links explained
- Side by side places facts from each record together, so you can see status, weight and dates at a glance.
- It does not compare content. It does not say which is stricter. Read the official texts for that.
How they are linked
- EMA CS clinical trials replaces EMA eSource paper (2010) · Source Unverified link
Side by side
| EMA CS clinical trials | EMA eSource paper (2010) | |
|---|---|---|
| Authority | EMA | EMA |
| Legal weight | Guidance & Q&A | Guidance & Q&A |
| Status | Final | Superseded |
| Last verified | Not yet | Not yet |
| Summary | EMA guideline for clinical trials on computerised systems and electronic data. It covers data integrity, responsibilities, validation, audit trails, user management, security, data migration and archiving, and it includes artificial intelligence. It replaced the 2010 reflection paper on electronic source data. | Earlier EMA reflection paper on electronic source data in clinical trials. EMA has replaced it with the Guideline on computerised systems and electronic data in clinical trials. |
| Lifecycle |
|
|
| Source | Official text Source: EMA. | Official text Source: EMA. |
These facts are placed side by side from each record. This page does not say which is stricter or whether requirements differ. Read the official texts.